Cases 61 - 70 of 178
Barrios v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv23822
Plaintiff:
Karel Barrios
Defendant:
Nationwide Facility Maintenance, Alejandro David Garcia and Bertha Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramos v. YOKOPOR et al
as 1:2017cv23107
Plaintiff:
Sonnya Piedad Ramos
Defendant:
GALIT YOKOPOR and RONEN YOKOPOR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Alonzo v. ES&R Construction Corp et al
as 1:2017cv22210
Plaintiff:
German Alonzo
Defendant:
ES&R Construction Corp , Briceida Hernandez and Edy S. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ramos v. Inka Foods II, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv20457
Plaintiff:
Alberto Ramos
Defendant:
Inka Foods II, LLC and Jorge Vega
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Woods et al v. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv02038
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods and Alfa Ramos
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. and SNI Companies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ramos v. Acute Patient Care, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
Marisol Ramos
Defendant:
Acute Patient Care, Inc. , Ajaz Afzal , Ivette Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramos v. AMI Trading (U.S.A.), Inc.
as 1:2016cv23378
Plaintiff:
Maria Fernanda Ramos
Defendant:
AMI Trading (U.S.A.), Inc.
Mediator:
Cindy Niad Hannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos v. Going Green Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv23348
Plaintiff:
Yaniel Ramos
Defendant:
Going Green Construction, Inc., Rubi Ortega and Angel Prieto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
RAMOS v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv21887
Plaintiff:
LINDA RAMOS
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Holiday CVS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
RAMOS v. R&D GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 0:2016cv61064
Defendant:
R&D GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. , DIANA MARUYAMA and REY PEREZ
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
