Cases 61 - 70 of 250
Marin v. Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
as 1:2017cv05488
Plaintiff:
Spencer Marin
Defendant:
Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sullivan et al v. Kafka Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03121
Defendant:
Berkley Regional Insurance Company, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Kafka Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U, AFL-CIO, Jeremiah Sullivan and Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, and Trustees of the International Masonry Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Tizol v. Brennan and Carr Rest. Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00848
Defendant:
Brennan and Carr Rest. Inc., Eddie Sullivan and Ursula Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Enrique Tizol
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Annuity Fund, Pension Fund and Welfare Fund et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers International Pension Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers Local Union No. 1, Building Restoration Industry Promotion Fund and others
Defendant:
Newmark Solutions, Corp. and Wilfredo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Cabredo et al v. Mount Sinai Hospitals Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv09978
Plaintiff:
Alma Cabredo , Amy Kelly , Tita Lazaga and others
Defendant:
Mount Sinai Hospitals Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint et al v. Blade Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06936
Defendant:
Blade Contracting, Inc., Teresa Punzone and Vincent Punzone
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint and Jeremiah Sullivan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Job Opportunities for Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06935
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Labor Management Committee, Bricklayers Local 1 and others
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Job Opportunities for Women, Inc., Ignazio Minucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan et al v. S&N Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06886
Defendant:
Advanced Construction Equipment Corp., John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, North American Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Sullivan, Jeremiah Sullivan and Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, and Trustees of the International Masonry Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint et al v. Providence Contruction Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv06346
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint, International Masonry Institute and Jeremiah Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant:
Sailaja Chitta and Providence Contruction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Sullivan et al v. Pepe et al
as 1:2016cv06215
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and Thomas Pepe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
