Cases 71 - 80 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv80990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Paz-Elorza v. Ress et al
as 9:2017cv80989
Plaintiff:
Paulina Paz-Elorza
Defendant:
Andrew M Ress and Andrew M Ress and Associates M.D P.A
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Andrews v. Pinchers Crab Shack of Naples, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00389
Defendant:
Pinchers Crab Shack of Naples, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIXSON et al v. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (USA)
as 4:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN MIXSON and ANDREW JAMES MIXSON
Defendant:
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
VELASQUEZ v. MIAMI VISTA PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv21742
Plaintiff:
LIONEL VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
MIAMI VISTA PROPERTIES, INC., FORTEZZA FAMILY PROPERTIES, LLC and ANDREW LUDWIG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Efkarpides v. Corporate Coaches, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60840
Plaintiff:
Polychronis George Efkarpides
Defendant:
Corporate Coaches, Inc., Casino Limo Corp. and Andrew R. Bardar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Efkarpides v. Corporate Coaches, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60839
Plaintiff:
Polychronis George Efkarpides
Defendant:
Corporate Coaches, Inc. , Casino Limo Corp. and Andrew R. Bardar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Stehman v. Elite Consumer Services, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Stehman
Defendant:
Elite Consumer Services, LLC and Andrew Trexler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Dovo v. B&B Entertainment, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv60674
Plaintiff:
Tammy Dovo
Defendant:
B&B Entertainment, LLC, Andrew Behn and Andrew Behm
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Batista Velazquez v. Paradise Parking Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv21310
Plaintiff:
Arley Batista Velazquez
Defendant:
Paradise Parking Systems, LLC, Double Park, LLC, Daniel Radrizzani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
