Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Wood et al v. City of Elgin
as 1:2007cv05418
Plaintiff:
William F. Wood, JR., Lance Adams, III, Jennifer L. Ahrens and others
Defendant:
City of Elgin and City of Elgin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Harris et al v. Skytech Enterprises, Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv05244
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris, Heath Matlock, Kenneth Williams and others
Defendant:
Skytech Enterprises, Ltd., Asbery Rackestraw and Barry Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. E&L Trucking Company
as 1:2007cv05192
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
E&L Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Village of Bellwood
as 1:2007cv05194
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Village of Bellwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Phillips Heating & Cooling, Inc.
as 1:2007cv05056
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund, Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Phillips Heating & Cooling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bishop et al v. Vensons et al
as 1:2007cv03952
Plaintiff:
Travis Bishop, Jr., Rafic Badran, Magdaleno Barron and others
Defendant:
Apartment Investment And Management Company, Aimco Properties LP and NHP Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. E & K Express Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
E & K Express Co., Inc. and Patrick A. Pitello
Garnishee:
Patrick N. Ryan and Gary Murkowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Decking and Siding Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01358
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Decking and Siding Inc, Jones and Brown Company Inc and Jones and Brown Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Pointers, Cleaners and Caulkers Subordinate Union Local 52 of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO v. Saineghi et al
as 1:2007cv00902
Plaintiff:
Pointers, Cleaners and Caulkers Subordinate Union Local 52 of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO, Pointers, Cleaners and Caulkers Subordinate Union Local 52 of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO and Pointers, Cleaners and Caulkers Subordinate Union Local 52 of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Phillip Saineghi and J & D Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Bunyan et al v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Bunyan, Phillip C. Cenatiempo, Michael E. Lewis and others
Defendant:
Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
