Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Feng v. Naples Hibachi Buffet Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Yunfang Feng
Defendant:
Naples Hibachi Buffet Inc and Ming Shi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gutierrez Perez v. #1 Asian Buffet Inc. et al
as 9:2022cv81437
Plaintiff:
Carlos Efrain Gutierrez Perez
Defendant:
#1 Asian Buffet Inc., Jin Bin Wu and Rendong Yuan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castro Marquez v. Ultimate Buffet Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv21063
Defendant:
Will Lin and Ultimate Buffet Inc.
Plaintiff:
Oscar Modesto Castro Marquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Regueira v. Ultimate Buffet, Inc.
as 1:2019cv25156
Plaintiff:
HENRY REGUEIRA
Defendant:
ULTIMATE BUFFET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Rodriguez v. City Buffet, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ramon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bin Xing Li, City Buffet, Inc. and Nai R. Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Labrada v. El Balcon Latino Buffet, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv02110
Plaintiff:
Anaysa Leal Labrada
Defendant:
El Balcon Latino Buffet, Inc., Nelson Figueroa, Joansy C. Andujar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yong v. China Buffet Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv80733
Plaintiff:
Chen Xiao Yong
Defendant:
China Buffet Inc. and Jian Guang Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Torres v. Makino Japanese Buffet, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv20785
Plaintiff:
Daniel Valderrabano Torres
Defendant:
Makino Japanese Buffet, Inc. , Tony Lin , Ming Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Mendoza et al v. Uptown Buffet, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv22799
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Mendoza and Arcadio Mendoza
Defendant:
Uptown Buffet, Inc. and Qiu Qing Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Rivera v. China Garden Buffet, Inc.
as 2:2007cv14087
Plaintiff:
Wilian G. Rivera
Defendant:
China Garden Buffet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
