Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Chapman v. Las Vegas Basketball L.P. et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Delores Chapman
Defendant:
Las Vegas Basketball L.P. d/b/a and a/k/a Las Vegas Aces (erroneously sued as Las Vegas Aces d/b/a and a/k/a Las Vegas Basketball L.P.), MVP Event Productions LLC d/b/a and a/k/a MVP Event Staffing, Lauren Gentzler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Ace Remas, LLC
as 3:2016cv00110
Defendant:
Ace Remas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Nathan Franklin Andrews v. Sky Combat Ace et al
as 2:2014cv01050
Defendant:
Air Combat Ace LLC, Amibug Holdings LLC, Richard Coe and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Franklin Andrews
Mediator:
Deborah C Saxe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Tessema v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
as 2:2013cv01782
Defendant:
A-N.L.V. Cab Co., Ace Cab Inc, Manuel Armenta and others
702) 474-0631 (fax:
Tadios Tessema
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys v. Lake Mead Emergency Physicians, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00896
Defendant:
ACS Recovery Services, Inc., Agata-Venger Partnership, LLP, CHW Nevada Imaging Company, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys
Plaintiff:
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys
ThirdParty Defendant:
Dina Hamilton
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Wilson-McShane Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Wilson-McShane Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Nydes v. Osborne et al
as 2:2011cv01675
Defendant:
Aces & Ales, Douglas Osborne and Tail Spin Bar & Grill
Plaintiff:
Holly Nydes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
