Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hill v. Tannex Development LC
as 4:2024cv10056
Plaintiff:
Allison Hill
Defendant:
Tannex Development LC doing business as Opal Key Resort & Marina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. 20 SE 3rd St LLC et al
as 9:2018cv81009
Defendant:
Barbara Wortley Individually, Liberty Acquisitions FPB LLC, Liberty Properties at Waverly LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Thomas v. Palm Gardens Mobile Home Park, LC et al
as 5:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Stacy Thomas
Defendant:
Palm Gardens Mobile Home Park, LC and Keith Buse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Rodriguez v. The Citadel Group, LC et al
as 1:2017cv22189
Plaintiff:
Rolando Lopez Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Citadel Group, LC and George Befeler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Lowney v. Deja Vu Showgirls of Tampa, LC et al
as 8:2017cv00535
Plaintiff:
Shawna Lowney
Defendant:
Deja Vu Showgirls of Tampa, LC and Mark Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Deja Vu Consulting, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01193
Plaintiff:
Zurina Garcia
Defendant:
Deja Vu Consulting, Inc., DV Saginaw, LLC, Deja Vu Showgirls and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ensignia v. ACK, LC et al
as 1:2015cv23527
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Ensignia
Defendant:
AKB, LC, Balans Brickell, LLC and Jane Choi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Butler v. Pro Tile, LC
as 3:2015cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brad Butler
Defendant:
Pro Tile, LC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BINGHAM v. LC DOUGH BOYS III LLC
as 3:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
DAWN BINGHAM
Defendant:
LC DOUGH BOYS III LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Moceri v. Ratner Companies, LC et al
as 2:2014cv00579
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Moceri
Defendant:
Ratner Companies, LC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
