Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Freebird Communications, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan et al v. Roberts et al
as 2:2018cv02026
Plaintiff:
Freebird Communications, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan , Freebird Communications, Inc. and Michael Scarcello
Defendant:
Matthew Roberts , Boxer Media Group LLC , Shelley Garza-Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Roberts v. Scarcello et al
as 2:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roberts
Defendant:
Michael Scarcello , Freebird Communications, Inc. and Freebird Communications, Inc., Profit Sharing Trust
Counter_claimant:
Michael Scarcello and Freebird Communications, Inc., Profit Sharing Trust
Counter_defendant:
Matthew Roberts , Shelley Garza-Roberts, Boxer Media Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Michael Scarcello
Cross_defendant:
Freebird Communications, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Shelley Garza-Roberts, Boxer Media Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation and Boxer Media Group LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kosloff et al v. Smith et al
as 6:2013cv01466
Plaintiff:
David Kosloff and Michael McMaude
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lee Smith, Jeffrey Lucke , Lucke & Associates, CPA's, L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of v. Intellisoft Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv02604
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of
Defendant:
Intellisoft Corp. and Intellisoft Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao et al v. Professional Resources, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02077
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Professional Resources, Inc. and Professional Resources, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
