Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wilcock v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Wendi Wicock
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nicol v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Plaintiff:
Marie-Louise Nicol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Shell v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2020cv00553
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Shell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Brusack v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brusack
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lane v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2017cv00998
Plaintiff:
Dawna Lane
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Valerio v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Valerio
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McNew v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Diana McNew
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Dobraca v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2016cv00791
Plaintiff:
Rifet Dobraca
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Latta v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kimberly B. Latta
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Spendlove v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 2:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Douglas V. Spendlove
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
