Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ALMEIDA v. M&N CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
WILINTON ALMEIDA
Defendant:
M&N CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC and MIGUEL R. RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Latinos Motors of Orlando Inc et al
as 6:2020cv00678
Defendant:
MATRIX AUTO SALES, INC., LATINOS MOTORS OF ORLANDO INC, CARLOS M. ALDERETE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE R. RODRIGUEZ
RODRIGUEZ v. TRI-STAR AIRPORT HANDLING SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2018cv20553
Plaintiff:
Luis R. Rodriguez
Defendant:
TRI-STAR AIRPORT HANDLING SERVICES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
RODRIGUEZ v. HOSPITALITY STAFFING TEAM LLC
as 1:2017cv24719
Plaintiff:
AREVALO R. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
HOSPITALITY STAFFING TEAM LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
HERRERA v. AMAZING DESIGN AND SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2014cv23975
Plaintiff:
OSCAR HERRERA
Defendant:
AMAZING DESIGN AND SERVICES LLC , RAFAEL R RODRIGUEZ and LLERENA JUAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
LOBAINA et al v. MULTIBAND FIELD SERVICES, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2013cv21733
Plaintiff:
JAVIER LOBAINA , HENRY ZAMORA , JAIRO AVILA and others
Defendant:
MULTIBAND FIELD SERVICES, INCORPORATED, GROUPWARE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Ronald Dean
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rodriguez v. AMPM Cleaning Solutions, LLC
as 8:2011cv02661
Plaintiff:
Iris R. Rodriguez
Defendant:
AMPM Cleaning Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez et al v. Aquatic Plant Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv14265
Plaintiff:
R. Rodriguez, R. H. Rodriguez, M. Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Aquatic Plant Management, Inc. and Albert Suarez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cubas v. Southern Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv22773
Plaintiff:
Jose Cubas
Defendant:
Southern Construction Services, Inc., Domingo R. Castro and Oscar R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
