Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Corman v. JWS of New Mexico, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00913
Plaintiff:
Richard Corman
Defendant:
JWS of New Mexico, Inc. and K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Babcock v. Albuquerque Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv01179
Defendant:
Albuquerque Police Department, City of Albuquerque and Albuquerque Police Officers Association
Plaintiff:
Tod Babcock , John Corvino , Bruce DeHerrera and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Aragon et al v. Sandia Corporation
as 1:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Aragon , Lawrence A. Armijo , Michael Benavidez and others
Defendant:
Sandia Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Allen v. BHP Navajo Coal Co., et al.
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Dommicita Allen, Brian Allison, Duane Allison and others
Defendant:
BHP Navajo Coal Company and San Juan Coal Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Richard Gabaldon v. Chugach McKinley, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00061
Defendant:
Chugach McKinley, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Gabaldon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keelin et al v. City of Alamogordo
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tim Keelin, Louis Reynolds, Preston Eldridge and others
Defendant:
City of Alamogordo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sutherland v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01135
Plaintiff:
Richard A Sutherland
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garay et al v. James Hamilton Construction Company et al
as 2:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
Richard Garay and Piedad Garay
Defendant:
James Hamilton Construction Company, John Stebbins and James Hamilton PPO Options Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Garay et al v. James Hamilton Construction Company et al
as 1:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
Richard Garay and Piedad Garay
Defendant:
James Hamilton Construction Company, John Stebbins and James Hamilton PPO Options Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
