Cases 1 - 10 of 56
A. v. Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
as 1:2024cv04174
Plaintiff:
William A.
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
W. v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
Brian W.
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
C.M. et al v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
C. M. and R. M.
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Golden v. Dearborn Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin Golden
Defendant:
Dearborn Life Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
K. et al v. Health Care Service Corp.
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Robert K., Monica K. and John K.
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corp. dba Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois and Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Regents of the University of California v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06960
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California, a California constitutional corporation, on behalf of its UCLA Health System and The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dignity Health v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06969
Plaintiff:
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and Dignity Health a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation doing business as Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital doing business as Mercy San Juan Medical Center doing business as Mark Twain Medical Center San Andreas doing business as Saint Franci
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d.b.a. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
John Muir Health v. Health Care Service Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv06963
Plaintiff:
John Muir Health, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and John Muir Health
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
B. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kelly B. and K. B.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center et al v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center doing business as Sovereign Health of California, Sovereign Health of Phoenix Inc, Shreya Health of California, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
