Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barnett v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., Nabors Industries, Inc., Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
George Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Powersat Communications (USA) LP et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
Powersat Communications (USA) GP LTD and Powersat Communications (USA) LP
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Balo v. Pason Systems USA Corp.
as 2:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Christian Balo
Defendant:
Pason Systems USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jimenez v. Packers Plus Energy Services (USA) Inc.
as 1:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
Obed Jimenez
Defendant:
Packers Plus Energy Services (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Archibeque v. T-Mobile, USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv00689
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Archibeque
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA, Inc. and Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Goldberg v. Long Term Disability Coverage Plan of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ira Goldberg
Defendant:
Long Term Disability Coverage Plan of Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Short Term Disability Coverage Plan of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. New Mexico Coal 401(K) Personal Savings Plan et al
as 1:2007cv00736
Plaintiff:
LiliRae Smith
Defendant:
New Mexico Coal 401(K) Personal Savings Plan, USA Retirement Savings Plan and BHP Basic Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. New Mexico Coal 401(K) Personal Savings Plan et al
as 2:2007cv00736
Plaintiff:
LiliRae Smith
Defendant:
New Mexico Coal 401(K) Personal Savings Plan, USA Retirement Savings Plan and BHP Basic Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
