Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Chapski v. Cosmetic Executive Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06129
Defendant:
Carlotta Jacobson, Heidi Manheimer, Cosmetic Executive Women, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Agnes B. Chapski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Women Work Construction Corp.
as 1:2020cv08928
Petitioner:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund and others
Respondent:
Women Work Construction Corp. d/b/a WWC Contracting and Women Work Construction Corp. doing business as WWC Contracting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Sekosan v. A Bronx Women's Medical Pavilion, P.C. et al
as 1:2019cv11313
Plaintiff:
Marjana Sekosan
Defendant:
Brian E. Park, M.D. and A Bronx Women's Medical Pavilion, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bayne v. NAPW, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03591
Defendant:
NAPW, Inc., Professional Diversity Network, Inc., Professional Diversity Network, Inc. doing business as National Association of Professional Women doing business as International Association of Women and others
Plaintiff:
Debora Bayne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund et al v. Job Opportunities For Women, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02712
Plaintiff:
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Training Program Fund , John J. Virga and Robert Bonanza
Defendant:
Job Opportunities For Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Job Opportunities for Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06935
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Labor Management Committee, Bricklayers Local 1 and others
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Job Opportunities for Women, Inc., Ignazio Minucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trustees of the Pension and Welfare Funds of the Moving Picture Machine Operators Union, Local 306 v. The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association
as 2:2015cv07324
Defendant:
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pension and Welfare Funds of the Moving Picture Machine Operators Union, Local 306
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Job Opportunities for Women, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01706
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Local 1, International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers, and Bricklayers Labor Management Relations Committee, Bricklayers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Job Opportunities for Women, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Ignazio Minucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Training Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO v. Job Opportunities for Women, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00908
Plaintiff:
Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Training Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Job Opportunities for Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Local 205, District Council 1707, AFSCME v. North Bronx National Council of Negro Women Child Development Center
as 1:2012cv06068
Petitioner:
Local 205, District Council 1707, AFSCME
Respondent:
North Bronx National Council of Negro Women Child Development Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
