Cases 91 - 100 of 196
Matthews et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02552
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leroy Matthews and Jeanette Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gammel et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02549
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gammel and Richard Gammel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Solivais v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02555
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Solivais
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02074
Plaintiff:
Donald Anderson and Linda Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearon et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02070
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Pearon and Terry Pearon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02072
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Hooks and Robert Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Masters et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02069
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cindy Masters and David Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnston v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02071
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lashley et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02073
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denise Lashley and Michael Lashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Christoff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01887
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paulette Christoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
