Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 792
MUHSEN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00496
Plaintiff: HASSINA BAQI MUHSEN
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02033
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01915
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sharon Bridgewater v. James Comey
as 17-5041
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant - Appellee: James B. Comey, et al.,
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01820
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HAIDAR v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00396
Plaintiff: HUSSAIN I HAIDAR
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01223
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01736
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT et al v. KOSKINEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff: BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT , MICHAEL STOCK and MELISSA BATES STOCK
Defendant: JOHN KOSKINEN, DOE 1-100 JOHN, JEFFERSON SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?