Cases 91 - 100 of 83,532
City Of Chicago v. Glock, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Glock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rendleman et al v. Polaris Industries Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lucy Rendleman, Mary York and Sean York
Defendant:
Polaris Industries Inc and Polaris Sales Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Vance Gardner, et al v. MeTV
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
DAVID VANCE GARDNER and GARY MERCHANT
Defendant:
METV, a National Limited Partnership
Otten v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Otten
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Christopher Sotolar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. BHC Streamwood Hospital
as 1:2024cv03219
Plaintiff:
Whitney Martin
Defendant:
BHC Streamwood Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fabing v. Saini et al
as 1:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fabing
Defendant:
Pardeeps Saini and 11504185 Canada Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03193
Plaintiff:
Governent Employees Insurance Company a/s/o Anita Carton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Barnes v. DG Retail, LLC
as 1:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Barnes
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Schulte v. Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03224
Plaintiff:
Kathy Schulte
Defendant:
Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Davy v. Revlon and LOreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Kadian Davy
Defendant:
Revlon and LOreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products Inc, Strength of Nature Global LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
