Cases 101 - 110 of 975
Lapin v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lapin
Defendant:
Franziska Jones, BuyGoods Inc, Click Sales Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
Susan Wojcicki, William Henry Gates, Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allan v. Voices Against Violence et al
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Allan
Defendant:
Voices Against Violence, Angie, Emmie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Liles et al v. Skiles et al
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Candi-lee Liles and Cassidy Raelund
Defendant:
Sam Skiles, Jim Brannon, Bernard Mchugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Luhm v. Prosource Produce, LLC
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Luhm
Defendant:
Prosource Produce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Presley v. Echo Rental Company et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Karen E. Presley
Defendant:
Echo Rental Company, Rebecca Cawley and Brooks Seaplane Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Prosource Produce, LLC
as 1:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ching-Yi Ortiz
Defendant:
Prosource Produce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Prosource Produce, LLC
as 1:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wood
Defendant:
Prosource Produce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bray, et al. v. Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections, et al.
as 4:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bray, Michelle Bray and Estate of Colby Bray
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections, Skip Greene, Shauna Kress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Nicholson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Scott Nicholson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
