Cases 111 - 120 of 175
Park Cities Bank v. Lee et al
as 1:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Park Cities Bank
Defendant:
William Parker Lee and Colleen B Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams et al v. Morale et al
as 2:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Williams , Daniel T Carmichael , Andrew J Krause and others
Defendant:
Tonja S Morale, Samuel J Morale, Jr, DMR Trucking Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Talco Trucking Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
George M Williams and Shelley B Williams
Defendant:
Talco Trucking Inc, Clinton E Delambert, Hubert C Short and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Hamilton
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
James A Crawford
Defendant:
William H Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eden et al v. Terry R Pitt Construction Inc
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
William Eden and Jamie Eden
Defendant:
Terry R Pitt Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wolff v. Skavdahl et al
as 2:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Laurence Eustelle Wolff
Defendant:
Scott Skavdahl, R Michael Shickich, William Beaman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hicks v. Lee et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Marie Hicks
Defendant:
William Parker Lee, Colleen Lee and JHCT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corrigan v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Edward Marvin Corrigan
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Natrona County, Seventh Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gordon v. Reserve National Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kurt L Gordon
Defendant:
Reserve National Insurance Company and William Linton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolff v. Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00041
Defendant:
Alan B Johnson, Josh Oster, William H Pownall and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Eustelle Wolff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
