Cases 111 - 120 of 125
McConnell v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 5:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Michael Seth McConnell
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Abeln v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 2:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Shannon Abeln
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jurusz v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2010cv01110
Plaintiff:
David W. Jurusz
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
CODY v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 3:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
PAUL JEFF CODY
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bartens v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 8:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
William Bartens
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jurusz v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
David W. Jurusz
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gilbert v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2009cv01312
Plaintiff:
Francine Gilbert
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smith v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 8:2009cv01112
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Peirce v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
as 8:2009cv00597
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
Plaintiff:
Mary Peirce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 6:2008cv01491
Plaintiff:
George B. Shaw
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
