Cases 111 - 120 of 344
SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC. v. BAYER S.A.S.
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC.
Defendant:
BAYER S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stryker Spine, et al v. Biedermann Motech GMBH, et al
as 10-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stryker Spine
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Carbone, Aaron Markworth, Michael Horan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Biedermann Motech GMBH, Depuy Spine, Inc.,, Lutz Biedermann and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
United States of America
POTTER v. TOEI ANIMATION INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2010cv02085
Plaintiff:
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
Defendant:
TOEI ANIMATION INCORPORATED and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv02031
Plaintiff:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS LLP
as 1:2010cv01948
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
GRAFF/ROSS HOLDINGS LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BOBEL v. TELE-CONS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01913
Plaintiff:
ANDRZEJ BOBEL
Defendant:
TELE-CONS, INC. and MICHAEL MOISIN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01862
Plaintiff:
DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
GHARB v. UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD. et al
as 1:2010cv01847
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD., HAIM SHANI, BAREKET SHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. v. ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
as 1:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
Defendant:
ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GHARB v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 1:2010cv01845
Plaintiff:
SAMY GHARB
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD., BAREKET SHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
