Cases 111 - 120 of 923
USA v. Patterson Construction Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00781
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Patterson Construction Inc., Box Elder Properties , Autumn View Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Carter v. Seterus et al
as 1:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Carter
Defendant:
Seterus, Federal National Mortgage Association, Paul M. Halliday, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rojas v. Pettey et al
as 2:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Carlos Razo Rojas
Defendant:
Jax H. Pettey and Pettey & Associates Law Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olsen et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Nathan Olsen and Melinda Olsen
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Halliday Watkins and Mann PC , Paul M. Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Carrington Mortgage Services v. Gomez et al
as 2:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carrington Mortgage Services
Defendant:
Debra Gomez, Kaylynn Gygi, Michael Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ershigs Inc v. MIR Industrial et al
as 2:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ershigs Inc
Defendant:
MIR Industrial and Holcim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garlett Construction v. Leonard et al
as 2:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Garlett Construction
Defendant:
Curtis Leonard , Genevieve Leonard and Bank of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nevins/Adams-40 v. Plant Performance Services
as 2:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nevins/Adams-40
Defendant:
Plant Performance Services and Jeff Watson
Cross_claimant:
Plant Performance Services
Cross_defendant:
Jeff Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RM Lifestyles v. Kent et al
as 2:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
RM Lifestyles
Defendant:
Christopher Kent and Tobie Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Purdy v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Homer E. Purdy
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, Lundburg & Associates, JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
