Cases 121 - 130 of 363
Puongpun Sananikone v. USA
as 13-16589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUONGPUN SANANIKONE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jacquelynn Dorrance, et al v. USA
as 13-16548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BENNETT DORRANCE and JACQUELYNN DORRANCE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Allen Davis, et al v. USA
as 13-16458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLEN DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Salomon Villarreal v. USA
as 13-15261
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALOMON JUAN MARCOS VILLARREAL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
American Pacific Textile, Inc., et al v. USA
as 13-16348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN PACIFIC TEXTILE, INC., GRACE INTERNATIONAL, INC., HANDSOME TEXTILE SAIPAN CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hong Kong Entertainment, et al v. USA
as 13-16355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HONG KONG ENTERTAINMENT (OVERSEAS) INVESTMENT, LTD. and RIFU APPAREL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Ramirez v. USA, et al
as 13-56088
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN B. RAMIREZ, (As the person (last shareholder responsible for the assets and liabilities of the dissolved corporation Pro Business Coach, Inc.)
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BETH E. STROUD, ISABEL CORNEJO and others
USA v. Oakview Trust, et al
as 13-16197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OAKVIEW TRUST and THE CHRIS AND CARRIE CAPRIOTI FAMILY TRUST, by Global Administrative Services as Trustee
Steven Wyman, et al v. USA
as 13-55990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN D. WYMAN, husband and LAUREL A. WYMAN, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin Scott, et al v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 13-55712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN SCOTT, husband and MARGARET SCOTT, wife
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
