Cases 131 - 140 of 64,843
Park Construction Company v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03224
Plaintiff:
Park Construction Company
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
J&L Imperium Industries, LLC v. RPM International Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03236
Plaintiff:
J&L Imperium Industries, LLC
Defendant:
RPM International Inc., Does 1-10, Sika AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
VERA CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03244
Plaintiff:
VERA CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
H & S REDI MIX, INC. v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
H & S READY MIX, INC. and H & S REDI MIX, INC.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Cal Prime, Inc. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03256
Plaintiff:
Cal Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Yoon v. Malibu Boats, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Seongjae Yoon
Defendant:
Malibu Boats, Inc., Jack Springer, Bruce Beckman and others
Vickers v. Energy Health & Fitness, Corp.
as 1:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Lachae Vickers
Defendant:
Energy Health & Fitness, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Discolo v. United Security, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Francis Discolo
Defendant:
United Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
