Cases 131 - 140 of 331
James v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00083
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rochelle James
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Sheppard v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Sheppard
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Gorman v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00087
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela Gorman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Suzan v. McCloskey Motors, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
Nasiri Suzan
Defendant:
McCloskey Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Begay v. Big "E" Incorporated, et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Begay
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Cadman v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Cindy A Cadman
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Livingston et al v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Juliana Livingston and Ray Livingston
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Tabaha v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Arlene Tabaha
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Tabaha v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Virginia Tabaha
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Becenti v. Big "E" Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Patricia Becenti
Defendant:
Big "E" Incorporated and Native American Loan Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
