Cases 151 - 160 of 173
Patrick et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv60883
Plaintiff:
Lottie M. Patrick and John D. Patrick
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brookman et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
Lesley Brookman and Michael Brookman
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 8:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
Ann J. Lane and Daniel Lane
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spitzner et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2012cv00658
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Dianne Spitzner and James W. Spitzner
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21452
Plaintiff:
Maria McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maritza Valle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60648
Plaintiff:
Maritza Valle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Judith G Floyd
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
JOAN ADAMS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON WOMENS HEALTH & UROLOGY, ETHICON INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bodah v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv80333
Plaintiff:
Carole Ann Bodah
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bodah v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv14105
Plaintiff:
Carole Ann Bodah
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
