Cases 11 - 20 of 7,207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Khamis et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A. et al
as 1:2024cv03640
Plaintiff:
Nabeel A Khamis, Mutasim Ibrahim Abdalla Mohammed, Monica H Timon and others
Defendant:
BNP Paribas, S.A. and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Lako et al v. BNP Paribas S.A. et al
as 1:2024cv03641
Plaintiff:
Noel Jada Lako, Jafar Harry Jumma Hasapallh, Khalid Khater Mohamed Ali and others
Defendant:
BNP Paribas S.A. and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sun v. Mo et al
as 1:2024cv03630
Plaintiff:
Yi Sun
Defendant:
Hugh H MO, Tsai Chung Chao, New York City Police Department : and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
