Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Vashisht-Rota v. Reyes, et al.
as 24-7819
Defendant:
ANGELA F. FONNESBECK and SEAN D. REYES, UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 24-7821
Defendant:
CHRIS HOWELL and HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
as 24-7815
Defendant:
OTTAWA UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University, et al.
as 24-7589
Defendant:
OTTAWA UNIVERSITY and HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Vashisht-Rota v. Reyes, et al.
as 24-7171
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH, Judge MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, both an individual and her official capacities, Judge KIRK M. MORGAN, both an individual and his official capacities and others
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an individual; pro se allowed to efile
Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
as 24-5962
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
OTTAWA UNIVERSITY
Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University, et al.
as 24-5684
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
OTTAWA UNIVERSITY and HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al.
as 24-994
Plaintiff:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant:
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, a Utah limited liability company and CHRIS HOWELL, an individual
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Bluechip Services, et al
as 23-55740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant / Appellee:
BLUECHIP SERVICES, (International), An India Private Limited Company, BLUECHIP SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CHENNAI, An India Private Limited Company, MOHAMMED HARISS and others
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70109
Not Classified By Court:
In re: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, CHRIS HOWELL, an individual and others
Petitioner:
APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
