Cases 11 - 20 of 131
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21323
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAYMOND BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Preston et al v. Managed Care of North America Inc
as 0:2023cv61294
Plaintiff:
Scott Preston, B. W., C. W. and others
Defendant:
Managed Care of North America Inc doing business as MCNA Dental
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Preston v. W. et al
as 0:2023cv61292
Plaintiff:
Scott Preston
Defendant:
B. W., C. W., J. A. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Preston et al
as 0:2023cv61293
Plaintiff:
Scott Preston, B. W., C. W. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
CASSIDY et al v. Tri-City Electric Co., INC.
as 0:2023cv60895
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY T. CASSIDY, JAMES F. STUBBLEFIELD, JUSTIN S. McINTOSH and others
Defendant:
Tri-City Electric Co., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11078
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10763
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrow v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv16057
Plaintiff:
Ebrima Barrow
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWELL-BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21549
Plaintiff:
SONYA L HOWELL-BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20274
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
