Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,260
Cintron v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03836
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Melissa Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Glover v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03835
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Anthony Glover and Anthony L. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03800
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Doris F Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HUME v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04113
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: ANGELA L. HUME
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Zeek v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv50134
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Carol L. Zeek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Horton v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03724
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Bennie Lee Horton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Alba, Jr. v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03739
Defendant: Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Alba, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Beckwith v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv03650
Plaintiff: Darius L. Beckwith
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Onsen v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv03654
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Scott Onsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harper v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03652
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Terry Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?