Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Marmol v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2012cv00588
Plaintiff:
Cesar Marmol
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and David Roark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv22989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hysaj v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2010cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ivi Hysaj
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and David Roark
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
ZENGIN v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv21366
Plaintiff:
Huseyin Sait ZENGIN
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Robert S Mueller III , Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Vazquez v. Napolitano et al
as 6:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coma Vazquez
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas, Robert m. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NEMCOVA et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 5:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
RENATA NEMCOVA and TOMAS TKADLECEK
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DAVID ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Devanjali Inc. et al v. Roark et al
as 8:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
Devanjali Inc. and Vijaykumar B. Patel
Defendant:
David Roark, Alejandor Mayorkas and Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
