Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chip v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5128
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Greektown Casino, LLC, Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior and David Longly Bernhardt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chip v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5127
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Greektown Casino, LLC, Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior and David Longly Bernhardt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Center for Biological Div, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5078
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Forest Resources Association, Inc., Ohio Oil and Gas Association, National Association of Homebuilders of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Independent Petroleum Association of America
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Petroleum Institute and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service
Association of O&C Counties v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5011
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Oregon Wild and Soda Mountain Wilderness Council
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Association of O&C Counties
Association of O&C Counties v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5010
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, United States of America, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Oregon Wild, Soda Mountain Wilderness Council and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Association of O&C Counties
Stand Up For California!, et al v. DOI, et al
as 19-5285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lynn Wheat, Patty Johnson, Joe Teixeira and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, John Tahsuda, III, In his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Wilton Rancheria, California
Friends of Animals, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 19-5147
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
National Rifle Association of America and Safari Club International
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Friends of Animals
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency of the United States and David Longly Bernhardt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
