Cases 11 - 20 of 36
BASANI v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2017cv02646
Plaintiff:
MARIA ANURAG REDDY BASANI
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
VANUKURI et al v. TILLERSON et al
as 1:2017cv01629
Plaintiff:
RADHA VANUKURI and VEERABHADRA JAGANNADHARAMJI MERLA
Defendant:
REX W. TILLERSON, ELAINE DUKE, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sarabia v. Tillerson et al
as 1:2017cv01813
Plaintiff:
Sergio Sarabia
Defendant:
Rex Tillerson, David T. Donahue and Brenda S. Sprague
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In re: Omer Al Obaidy v. USDC-CASF
as 17-72122
:
In re: OMER AL OBAIDY
Petitioner:
OMER AL OBAIDY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN F. KELLY, REX W. TILLERSON, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
