Cases 11 - 20 of 201
MCLEAN et al v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, COUNTRY OF 1924 TO PRESENT PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF RUSSIA et al
as 1:2019cv03312
Defendant:
INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY, FACEBOOK, INC., URANIUM ONE GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LOUIS FANNING, SR., ESTATE OF JAMES MCLEAN and VICKI FANNING MCLEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FANNING v. HCP OXFORD OBG CASS PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02644
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
HCP OXFORD OBG CASS PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC and HCP OXFORD OBG WACKER PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. MOUNTAIN CRANE SERVICE, LLC
as 1:2017cv02454
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
MOUNTAIN CRANE SERVICE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. KELLY-HILL COMPANY, LLC
as 1:2017cv02317
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
KELLY-HILL COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. WW CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED
as 1:2017cv02324
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
WW CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. WITTICH BROS. MARINE, INC.
as 1:2017cv02318
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
WITTICH BROS. MARINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. ABM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02297
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
ABM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., ABM FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P.
as 1:2017cv02089
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
MAXIM CRANE WORKS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. NORLITE, LLC
as 1:2017cv01754
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
NORLITE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
FANNING v. QSL NDT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01647
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
QSL NDT, INC. and MISTRAS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
