Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION v. LAURSEN
as 1:2012mc00251
Petitioner: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent: ANDREW L. LAURSEN
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00202
Plaintiff: FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION , UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION , DEANA TANNER OKUN and others
Intervenor_defendant: KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC. , L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC. , SANDBERG FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION v. ZODIAC INTERACTIVE
as 1:2010mc00621
Petitioner: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent: ZODIAC INTERACTIVE
Movant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and VERIZON SERVICE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. v. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010mc00522
Petitioner: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Respondent: U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, PANASONIC CORPORATION LTD. and MOUSER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION v. RICHARDS
as 1:2009mc00200
Petitioner: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent: JAMES D RICHARDS, III
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
Type: Other Statutes None
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.
as 1:2008mc00062
Petitioner: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent: SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?