Cases 11 - 20 of 604
Ferguson v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04561
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ferguson
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weldon et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04560
Plaintiff:
Joshua Weldon and Rashawn Underdue
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Girard v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04559
Plaintiff:
Eugene Girard
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv04563
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mitchell
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMMS et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv04562
Plaintiff:
HARRY MIMMS and JOSEPH INGRAM
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weed v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04247
Plaintiff:
William Weed, III
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Facchine et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04421
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE FACCHINE and JOSEPH A. KOLODZIEJ
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Gee v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04237
Plaintiff:
Clinton Gee
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyers v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04239
Plaintiff:
Jacob Meyers
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Townsend v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv04240
Plaintiff:
Wade Townsend
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
