Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Top Tobacco, L.P. et al v. Good Times USA LLC
as 1:2014cv08978
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco, L.P. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Good Times USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Top Tobacco, L.P. et al v. Landers
as 1:2014cv05630
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco, L.P. and Republic Tobacco, L.P.
Defendant:
Daniel Landers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Top Tobacco, L.P. v. Kiraco, LLC d/b/a AOT et al
as 1:2014cv05638
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco, L.P. and Republic Tobacco, L.P.
Defendant:
Kiraco, LLC and Albert Kirakosian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Top Tobacco L.P. et al v. Top Wholesale Distributor, Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv06510
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco L.P. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Top Wholesale Distributor, Ltd. and Shenzhen Yacya Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Top Tobacco L.P. et al v. Top World Wholesale, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06484
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco L.P. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Top World Wholesale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Republic Tobacco, L.P. v. Ferraro et al
as 1:2013cv01639
Plaintiff:
Republic Tobacco, L.P.
Defendant:
Paul Ferraro and Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Top Tobacco L.P. et al v. Midwestern Cash and Carry, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04460
Plaintiff:
Top Tobacco L.P. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Midwestern Cash and Carry, LLC , Midwest Cash and Carry, Inc. , Nusrat H. Choudri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
DRL Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Good Times USA LLC
as 1:2011cv02779
Plaintiff:
DRL Enterprises, Inc. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Good Times USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Republic Tobacco L.P. v. Commonwealth Brands, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03267
Plaintiff:
Republic Tobacco L.P. and Republic Tobacco L.P.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
