Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Milagros Young
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holt v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08062
Plaintiff:
Michelle Holt
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Russell Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bary v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01842
Plaintiff:
Norma Bary
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Halperin v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05181
Plaintiff:
Keri B. Halperin
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Type:
Other Statutes
Cheney v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2009cv05047
Plaintiff:
James R Cheney, Jr
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gomez v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2007cv07034
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez, Jose Gomez and Jose Gomez
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clayburn v. Accredited Collection Agency Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02222
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clayburn
Defendant:
Accredited Collection Agency Inc, Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc, Norman G Kalina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
