Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
The State of Texas et al v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03394
Plaintiff: The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc. , Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America, et al v. Omnicare, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00275
Plaintiff: The State of North Carolina , The State of Tennessee , The State of Nevada and others
Defendant: Pharmerica Corp. , Neighborcare, Inc. , Omnicare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Novartis AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv04265
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Defendant: Novartis AG, Novartis Ophthalmics, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex rel, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv08196
Plaintiff: United States Of America , State of California , State of Colorado and others
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Interpleader_plaintiff: State of Washington
Intervenor_plaintiff: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 False Claims Act - Civil Actions
United States Of America v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff: the State of Indiana, the State of Georgia, the State of New Jersey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and DEF
Intervenor Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Respondent: Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Petitioner: Patrick A. Klingman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party: Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court: Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner: US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant: American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne: Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor: Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00503
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant: Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party: 21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex rel. Joseph Piacentile v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv03983
Defendant: Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Relator: Kevin Kilcoyne, Joseph Piacentile and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?