Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
American Public Power Assoc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70339
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70344
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON and CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Natl. Alliance of Forest Owner v. EPA, et al
as 15-1478
Petitioner:
National Alliance of Forest Owners
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al v. County of Maui
as 15-17447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation, SIERRA CLUB - MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation, SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ARIZONA, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming, AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES and others
Indiana Utility Group v. EPA, et al
as 15-1459
Petitioner:
Indiana Utility Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
The North American Coal Corp. v. EPA, et al
as 15-1451
Petitioner:
The North American Coal Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
The Kansas City Board v. EPA
as 15-1442
Petitioner:
The Kansas City Board of Public Utilities-- Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
