Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as 2:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
Tom Partridge , Zane L. Christensen , Jennifer J. Christensen and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wells
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Pattinson v. Humana Insurance
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tamara Pattinson
Defendant:
Humana Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harman et al v. Wilson-Davis & Co.
as 2:2016cv00229
Petitioner:
Kent Harman , Tamara Harman , Jack Harman and others
Respondent:
Wilson-Davis & Co.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Riverbend Ranch Equestrian Center et al v. Duvall et al
as 2:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Riverbend Ranch Equestrian Center and Tamara Rae Larsen
Defendant:
Robert Duvall , Robert Carliner and Wild Horses Productions Entertainment
Counter_claimant:
Wild Horses Productions Entertainment
Counter_defendant:
Tamara Rae Larsen and Riverbend Ranch Equestrian Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wells
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Alvey v. Packer
as 2:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jesse J. Alvey
Defendant:
Tamara S. Packer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. Hartford Comprehensive Employee Benefit Service Company
as 2:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
Tamara Richardson
Defendant:
Hartford Comprehensive Employee Benefit Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Colvin
as 2:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Tamara Miller
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collins et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00687
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals and Astrazeneca PLC
Plaintiff:
Wendy Collins and Tamara Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
