Cases 11 - 16 of 16
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv02025
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA v. NORTON et al
as 1:2002cv02057
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA and STATE OF MISSOURI
Defendant:
JOHN W. KEYS , MARYANNE C. BACH , DENNIS E. BREITZMAN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Amicu:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA , SOUTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE FEDERATION , MINNESOTA CONSERVATION FEDERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01878
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
STATE OF OHIO et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
as 1:2002cv01080
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
