Cases 11 - 20 of 354
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Infinity Management Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv10654
Respondent:
Tash Management Corp. and Infinity Management Corp.
Petitioner:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Mannix Family Market @ Hylan Blvd LLC et al v. Local 79, Construction and General Building Laborers et al
as 1:2019cv02929
Defendant:
Local 20, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 212, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (Concrete Carpenters), Local 45, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Plaintiff:
Mannix Family Market @ Forest and Richmond Ave. LLC, Kevin Mannix and Mannix Family Market @ Hylan Blvd LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Tutor Perini Building Corp. v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2017cv03765
Plaintiff:
Tutor Perini Building Corp.
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Charley v. Total Office Planning Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08642
Plaintiff:
Courtnaye Charley
Defendant:
Total Office Planning Services, Inc., United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 157 and Joseph Oddo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BD Development, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America AFL CIO
as 2:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
BD Development, LLC
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America AFL CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BD Development, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
BD Development, LLC
Defendant:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Tishman Construction Corporation v. District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2015cv05217
Petitioner:
Tishman Construction Corporation
Respondent:
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Hudson Yards Construction LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05210
Petitioner:
Hudson Yards Construction LLC
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cross Country Construction et al v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05215
Petitioner:
Cross Country Construction , Roger & Sons Concrete, Inc. , Sorbara Construction Corp. and others
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Pinnacle Industries II, LLC v. The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
as 1:2015cv05214
Petitioner:
Pinnacle Industries II, LLC
Respondent:
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
