Cases 11 - 17 of 17
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MEDICAL CENTER - UNIVERSITY CAMPUS et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv01558
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MEDICAL CENTER - UNIVERSITY CAMPUS , OROVILLE HOSPITAL , VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SUTTER HEALTH et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2014cv00850
Plaintiff:
SUTTER HEALTH , PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER , CHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BAPTIST ST. ANTHONY HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST ST. ANTHONY HEALTH SYSTEM , MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CENTER , STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL , MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER , PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER , WATERBURY HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HOSPITAL & OAKVIEW CARE CENTER, INC. et al v. LEAVITT
as 1:2007cv02329
Plaintiff:
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HOSPITAL & OAKVIEW CARE CENTER, INC., ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/SUNBELT, INC., FLORIDA HOSPITAL ZEPHYRHILLS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
