Cases 11 - 20 of 84,158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Henderson v. NEXT CLICK PARTNERS, LLC.
as 1:2024cv03664
Plaintiff:
Richard Henderson
Defendant:
NEXT CLICK PARTNERS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Japan America Trading Agency Inc. DBA Jatai International
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Japan America Trading Agency Inc. DBA Jatai International
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, ] CORPORATIONS, LIMITED ] LIABILITY COMPANIES, ] PARTNERSHIPS, ] AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
ELSAW v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv03658
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED ELSAW
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Connie Nolan, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LMR Home Health Care, Inc. v. Becerra
as 1:2024cv03676
Plaintiff:
LMR Home Health Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Smith v. New Direction, LLC
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Hallie L Smith
Defendant:
New Direction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peerless Network, Inc. v. FCC
as 24-1777
Petitioner:
PEERLESS NETWORK, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
USA v. Cornelius Jackson
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CORNELIUS M. JACKSON
USA et al v. Smart Holding Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv02960
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
