Cases 21 - 30 of 2,251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martin v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04368
Plaintiff:
Bren Martin
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04334
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Arnold
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Young v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04300
Plaintiff:
Susan J. Young
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carbajal v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv50194
Plaintiff:
Maria Graciela Carbajal
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pittman v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Sherri Pittman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Ledwayne Bell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Siedsma v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04247
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Siedsma
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Licona v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04250
Plaintiff:
Basilio Escorza Licona
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
