Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ozturk et al v. MADSEN et al
as 1:2023cv15498
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Ozturk, Handan Ozturk and Omer Ozturk
Defendant:
Director KENNETH MADSEN, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ozkaldi v. Madsen et al
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Ozkaldi
Defendant:
Director Kenneth Madsen, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Wang v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Hanchao Wang
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
