Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Agan v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
W.H. Agan
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc. , SB Decking Inc. , Parker-Hannifan Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rankins et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01715
Plaintiff:
Odell Rankins and Sarah Rankins
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Co. , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davies et al v. Aurora Pump Company et al
as 1:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Davies and Linda Davies
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc.
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stone v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., IMO Industries Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Oralia Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
