Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Solis v. Knishna Restaurant Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00224
Defendant:
Meena Chopra and Knishna Restaurant Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Jim Garden Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv00217
Defendant:
Jim Garden Corp. and Jin Wang
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Badam Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Defendant:
Badam Inc. and Fred Lacagnina
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Solis v. JJM-63 Restaurant Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv00139
Defendant:
Joseph Digirlomo, JJM-63 Restaurant Corp. and Leonard Oliva
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Coram Diner Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv00105
Defendant:
Coram Diner Corp. and Kostas Hionas
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. DJ's International Buffet, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00103
Defendant:
Ding Chen and DJ's International Buffet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Lucky Chang, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Defendant:
Mau-Hua Chang and Lucky Chang, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Lou Tage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv06381
Defendant:
Lou Tage, Inc. and Louis Selvaggio
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Joesal Corp. et al
as 2:2011cv06290
Defendant:
Joseph Arcabascio and Joesal Corp.
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. BKS Bethpage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv06232
Defendant:
BKS Bethpage, Inc., William Caven, John Coumatos and others
Plaintiff:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
