Cases 21 - 30 of 2,853
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAVIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv02195
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
REID et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Reid, Brandon A. Phillips and Charlie Boagni, Jr.
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and LINDA L. FAGAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CAPITOL PAVING OF D.C., INC. v. H&L CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv02148
Defendant:
H&L CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL PAVING OF D.C., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
